Structuring variable compensation for professional services teams: insights from industry leaders

If you’re in the professional services business, designing an effective variable compensation plan can be the difference between a high-performing team and a mediocre one.

If you’re a professional services leader, and want to know how to structure compensation plans for your team, then this article is for you.

It includes insights from Brandon Goldman of Contentful, as well as Srikrishnan Ganesan and Michael Rae of Rocketlane, shared in a conversation within the Preflight Community.

Moving beyond traditional metrics

One of the most striking revelations from the discussion was the deliberate move away from traditional metrics like utilization rates. Instead, companies are focusing on outcome-based metrics that directly impact customer success and business value.

The Time-to-Value (TTV) approach

Time-to-Value emerged as a central metric in modern PS compensation plans. This approach focuses on measuring specific intervals between key project milestones:

• Time to live: From kickoff to system go-live
• Time to completion: Overall project duration
• Time to setup completion: Initial configuration phase
• Time to complete integrations: Technical integration phase

What makes this approach particularly effective is its flexibility and applicability across different types of engagements. As Michael Rae from Rocketlane notes, "This approach works beyond onboarding—measuring consistently between Point A and Point B and comparing outcomes. Most engagements have a few critical milestones to track."

Balancing control and reality

A common concern with time-based metrics is the impact of factors outside the PS team's control, such as customer delays, holidays, or project reprioritization. To address this, successful companies implement:

1. Clear rules for recognizing and accommodating date changes
2. Communication protocols for customer-initiated delays
3. Overall delta tracking across projects with acceptable range limits

This balanced approach ensures that teams are held accountable for factors within their control while acknowledging the realities of client-facing work.

Customer satisfaction: The ultimate metric

Alongside time-based metrics, Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) remains a crucial component of variable compensation plans. This metric ensures that speed doesn't come at the expense of quality and customer experience.

Beyond base metrics: special incentive programs

Modern PS compensation plans are also incorporating special incentive programs (SPIFFs) for activities that drive long-term business value:

• Securing G2 reviews: Securing G2 reviews represents a valuable form of social proof, where successful project implementations are translated into verified customer testimonials that can influence potential buyers' decisions. These reviews serve as credible references for the sales team and boost the company's market presence.
  
  
• Generating customer advocacy: Customer advocacy goes beyond simple reviews, involving customers who actively promote your product or service through case studies, speaking engagements, or direct referrals. This type of advocacy is particularly valuable as it comes from peers and carries more weight than traditional marketing.

• Other customer success milestones: Other customer success milestones might include achieving specific business outcomes, completing advanced feature implementations, or reaching user adoption targets. These milestones demonstrate tangible value delivery and strengthen the customer relationship.

Key considerations for implementation

When designing a variable compensation plan for PS teams, consider:

1. Company stage: Compensation structures should evolve with your company's maturity
2. Automation capabilities: While automated tracking (through tools like Rocketlane) is beneficial, manual tracking can work for smaller teams
3. Milestone definition: Clearly define and communicate what constitutes key events and milestones
4. Range setting: Establish acceptable ranges for time-based metrics based on historical data and business goals

The evolution of PS compensation

The shift from input-based metrics (like utilization) to outcome-based metrics (like TTV and CSAT) reflects a broader evolution in how companies view Professional Services. This modern approach aligns compensation with both customer success and business objectives, creating a win-win scenario for all stakeholders.

Getting down to brass tacks

Effective variable compensation plans for PS teams balance multiple factors: measurable outcomes, customer satisfaction, and long-term business value. By focusing on metrics that teams can influence while acknowledging real-world complexities, companies can create compensation structures that drive the right behaviors and outcomes.

The key is to remain flexible and adapt the framework to your specific context while maintaining focus on what truly matters: delivering value to customers efficiently and effectively.

Join Preflight to engage with a global community of post-sale leaders and professionals, exchange valuable insights, and collaborate on tackling real-world challenges.